D.C. Councilmember Trayon White’s Federal Bribery Trial Declared Mistrial
In Washington, D.C., D.C. Councilmember Trayon White's federal bribery trial ended in a mistrial after the jury was split 9-3 in favor of acquittal.
Washington, DC, September 29, 2026 — A federal bribery trial involving D.C. Councilmember Trayon White has concluded with a mistrial. The outcome was declared after the jury, tasked with deliberating the charges, was unable to reach a unanimous verdict.
The jury was reportedly split 9-3 in favor of acquittal, meaning a majority of the jurors believed the evidence presented did not support a conviction on the bribery charges.
The specific charges faced by Councilmember White were not detailed in the provided information. Similarly, the exact date of the mistrial declaration, the court in which the trial took place, and the duration of the proceedings are not specified.
A mistrial signifies that the jury could not agree on a verdict. This can occur for various reasons, often due to fundamental disagreements among jurors regarding the interpretation of evidence or the law. In this case, the significant division within the jury, with nine out of twelve jurors leaning towards acquittal, indicates a substantial portion of the panel found the prosecution’s case unconvincing.
Following a mistrial, the next steps in the legal process are typically determined by the prosecution. This can include deciding whether to retry the case, potentially with new evidence or a modified strategy, or to drop the charges altogether. The U.S. Attorney’s Office, which would be responsible for prosecuting the federal charges, has not publicly announced its intentions regarding a retrial or any further action.
The contractor involved in the case, or any specific allegations of bribery, were not disclosed in the summary of the trend. Information regarding the permits, inspections, code violations, or specific fine amounts that may have been associated with the case is also not available.
The status of Councilmember White’s position on the D.C. Council remains unchanged pending any further legal developments. His defense team would have argued for his innocence throughout the trial, and the jury’s split suggests they found merit in those arguments.
Story summarized from the original created by JT.Key@fox.com (JT Key) on www.fox5dc.com, see more information here.
Media gallery
